2008/3/16, Keld Jørn Simonsen keld@dkuug.dk:
Hi
I would advocate against the abmon having different length of the abbreviations.
I don't understand, can you explain your objection? I received bug reports about the current ones so I made this patch to fix these abbreviations (abmon).
I would also like the contact address to be ratained, as I am the original contributor of the spec.
Yes, if you want, and you can also remove my email address. However, you don't represent a French group and I sent to you some emails on Feb 19 and Feb 29, and I didn't receive any useful reply or comments so I don't think your are the right contact. Do you have someone else to suggest?
Furthermore there are some of the fields that are not according to 14652, eg language and territory should be ISO 639 and ISO 3166 conformant.
As you can see in the diff, I didn't modify these fields, can you indicate the required changes?
The rest of the changes seem OK, if that is what you would like.
Fine but the changes aren't personal choices, I don't define the conventions only the use of "avril" abbreviation is more arguable.
Regards, Stéphane